MINI LAPAROTOMY CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MUSCLE SPLITTING VS MUSCLE DIVIDING INCISION; A RANDOMIZED STUDY
Keywords:
Mini Cholecystectomy, muscle splitting, muscle dividing, cholelithiasisAbstract
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Symptomatic Gall Stones disease is a common health problem not only in developed nations rather its incidence is increasing in developing countries probably because of changing dietary habits. This study will aid and encourage surgeons to bring in practice the muscle splitting or muscle dividing technique whenever they need to use mini laparotomy approach for open cholecystectomy.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the short term outcome in muscle splitting vs muscle dividing incision in mini laparotomy cholecystectomy.
STUDY DESIGN:
Randomized Controlled Trial
SETTING:
Department of surgery, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar.
DURATION: May 14, 2019 to Nov 13, 2019
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
Total of 94 patients (47 in each group) with indication of cholecystectomy fulfilling the inclusion criteria were subjected to mini laparotomy cholecystectomy. The pain, mobility after 1st postoperative day and hospital stay was noted in each group and were compared through SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 21.
RESULTS:
A total of 94 patients with indication of cholecystectomy were operated, which were divided in two equal groups. Average age was 43.19 years+ 10.85SD. Male to female ratio was 0.70:1. Short term outcome in term of postoperative pain, early mobility and hospital stay were significantly better in muscle splitting as that of muscle dividing groups.
CONCLUSION:
The muscle splitting incision is superior to muscle dividing incision in term of less pain, early mobility, less physiological alteration and hospital stay.
KEY WORDS:
Mini Cholecystectomy, muscle splitting, muscle dividing, cholelithiasis.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in the Journal of Medical Sciences (JMS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under the CC BY 4.0 license, author(s) retain the ownership of the copyright publishing rights without restrictions for their content, and allow others to copy, use, print, share, modify, and distribute the content of the article even for commercial purposes as long as the original authors and the journal are properly cited. No permission is required from the author/s or the publishers for this purpose. Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to JMS and its licensees in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), The corresponding author must certify and warrant the authorship and proprietorship and should declare that he/she has not granted or assigned any of the article’s rights to any other person or body.
The corresponding author must compensate the journal for any costs, expenses, or damages that the JMS may incur as a result of any breach of these warranties including any intentional or unintentional errors, omissions, copyright issues, or plagiarism. The editorial office must be notified upon submission if an article contains materials like text, pictures, tables, or graphs from other copyrighted sources. The JMS reserves the right to remove any images, figures, tables, or other content, from any article, whether before or after publication, if concerns are raised about copyright, license, or permissions and the authors are unable to provide documentation confirming that appropriate permissions were obtained for publication of the content in question.
