GENDER-BASED DIFFERENCES IN CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK PROFILES AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH AND WITHOUT CORONARY HEART DISEASE

Authors

  • Sobia Ali
  • Bibi Hajira Ishaq
  • Madiha Hameed
  • Zahid Sarfaraz Khan
  • kashif Ur Rehman khalil Khyber Medical College
  • Ubaidullah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.26.34.3.3

Abstract

 

Objective: To compare gender-based differences in cardiometabolic risk profiles among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without coronary heart disease

Materials and Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Khyber Medical College and Khyber Teaching Hospital and included 200 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: 100 with coronary heart disease and 100 without. Clinical and laboratory data included age, BMI, obesity, hypertension, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HbA1C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, CRP, and fibrinogen. Statistical analyses included independent-samples t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, Pearson chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression.

Results: Females had a higher mean BMI than males (p<0.001) and a higher prevalence of obesity (p<0.001). Median triglycerides were also higher among females (271 versus 240 mg/dL, p=0.037). Although females had higher mean HDL-C, low HDL-C by gender-specific thresholds was more common among females (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Females had a greater burden of obesity and adverse triglyceride and HDL-C patterns. Glycemic control and triglyceride reduction may be more important determinants of CHD than gender alone.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; gender differences; obesity; triglycerides; HbA1c; HDL cholesterol

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Sobia Ali, Bibi Hajira Ishaq, Madiha Hameed, Zahid Sarfaraz Khan, kashif Ur Rehman khalil, & Ubaidullah. (2026). GENDER-BASED DIFFERENCES IN CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK PROFILES AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH AND WITHOUT CORONARY HEART DISEASE. Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(3), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.26.34.3.3