DRUG PRESCRIBING COMPETENCY AMONG FINAL-YEAR DENTAL STUDENTS, HOUSE OFFICERS, AND RESIDENTS AT A PUBLIC SECTOR UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN KARACHI, PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.26.34.1.8Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess drug prescribing competency and compare these competencies across the clinical levels at Sindh Institute of Oral Health Sciences (SIOHS), Jinnah Sindh Medical University (JSMU).
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted over 4 months involving final-year dental students, house officers, and residents of SIOHS, JSMU. Data were collected using a modified questionnaire and analyzed with IBM SPSS. Descriptive statistics summarized the demographic data. ANOVA was used to compare the means of competency across four domains: Information Gathering, Clinical Decision Making, Communication, and Monitoring/Review. Tukey’s Post Hoc test was conducted to identify group-wise differences. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: About 102 participants responded. Most participants reported adequate knowledge of drug dosage, frequency, duration, and route. Residents (50.0–65.38%) and house officers (54.54–61.36%) showed higher prescribing competency than final-year students (9.37–31.25%).
CONCLUSION: When comparing prescribing competency, only the Information Gathering and Clinical Decision-Making domains were significant, with p-values of 0.018 and 0.042, respectively. Tukey’s Post Hoc test showed that only the Information Gathering domain was significantly different between final-year students and house officers, with a p-value of .013. Seniors demonstrated greater confidence in prescribing practices than their juniors, likely due to increased clinical exposure.
KEYWORDS: Prescription writing, dental students, clinical competency, drug prescriptions
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hina Shah, Izma Arif Muqri, Ifrah Urooj, Khansa Kanwal, Dua Ayoub, Aqsa Mubasher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Medical Sciences (JMS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under the CC BY 4.0 license, author(s) retain the ownership of the copyright publishing rights without restrictions for their content, and allow others to copy, use, print, share, modify, and distribute the content of the article even for commercial purposes as long as the original authors and the journal are properly cited. No permission is required from the author/s or the publishers for this purpose. Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to JMS and its licensees in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), The corresponding author must certify and warrant the authorship and proprietorship and should declare that he/she has not granted or assigned any of the article’s rights to any other person or body.
The corresponding author must compensate the journal for any costs, expenses, or damages that the JMS may incur as a result of any breach of these warranties including any intentional or unintentional errors, omissions, copyright issues, or plagiarism. The editorial office must be notified upon submission if an article contains materials like text, pictures, tables, or graphs from other copyrighted sources. The JMS reserves the right to remove any images, figures, tables, or other content, from any article, whether before or after publication, if concerns are raised about copyright, license, or permissions and the authors are unable to provide documentation confirming that appropriate permissions were obtained for publication of the content in question.

