ISOBARIC ROPIVACAINE AND ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN MOTOR BLOCKADE DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Authors

  • Umbrin Naz Department of Anaesthesia, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar - Pakistan
  • Nighat Aziz Department of Anaesthesia, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar - Pakistan
  • Tazmin Haider Department of Anaesthesia, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar - Pakistan
  • Aurang zeb Department of Anaesthesia, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar - Pakistan
  • Parhaizgar Khan Department of Anaesthesia, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar - Pakistan

Keywords:

Isobaric, Bupivacaine, Motor block, Ropivacaine, spinal, anaesthesia

Abstract

Objective: To compare the mean duration of motor blockade between 0.5% isobaric ropivicaine and 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine after spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery.
Material and Methods: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted in main operation theatre of Khyber Teaching Hospital from April 2013 to October 2013. A total of 88 patients were randomly allocated in two groups by lottery method, patients in group A (N=44) received ropivacaine 15 mg of 0.5% and patients in group B (N=44) received 15 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine. Spinal anaesthesia was given after preloading with 1000 ml of lactated ringers. The duration of motor blockade was assessed by modified Bromage scale.
Results: There was significant difference between the two groups in the mean-time of duration of motor block. Mean duration of motor blockade in group A was found to be 123.98±9.24 minutes and in group B it was 183.40±11.14 minute. This was clinically and statistically highly significant.
Conclusion: Fifteen mg isobaric Ropivacaine provided significantly shorter duration of motor block compared to 15 mg isobaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgeries by spinal anaesthesia.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-15

How to Cite

Naz, U., Aziz, N., Haider, T., zeb, A., & Khan, P. (2015). ISOBARIC ROPIVACAINE AND ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN MOTOR BLOCKADE DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA. Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(3), 121–124. Retrieved from https://jmedsci.com/Jmedsci/article/view/186

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 3 (2015): Contents

Section

Articles

License

All articles published in the Journal of Medical Sciences (JMS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).  Under the CC BY 4.0 license, author(s) retain the ownership of the copyright publishing rights without restrictions for their content, and allow others to copy, use, print, share, modify, and distribute the content of the article even for commercial purposes as long as the original authors and the journal are properly cited.  No permission is required from the author/s or the publishers for this purpose.  Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to JMS and its licensees in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), The corresponding author must certify and warrant the authorship and proprietorship and should declare that he/she has not granted or assigned any of the article’s rights to any other person or body.

The corresponding author must compensate the journal for any costs, expenses, or damages that the JMS may incur as a result of any breach of these warranties including any intentional or unintentional errors, omissions, copyright issues, or plagiarism. The editorial office must be notified upon submission if an article contains materials like text, pictures, tables, or graphs from other copyrighted sources. The JMS reserves the right to remove any images, figures, tables, or other content, from any article, whether before or after publication, if concerns are raised about copyright, license, or permissions and the authors are unable to provide documentation confirming that appropriate permissions were obtained for publication of the content in question.