THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF H. PYLORI CULTURE AND RAPID UREASE TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF H.PYLORI INFECTION KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS THE GOLD STANDARD Diagnostic accuracy of H.Pylori culture and rapid urease test
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy-based tests in the detection of Helicobacter Pylori infections keeping histopathology as a gold standard.
Materials and Methods: This validation study was conducted from August 2018 to February 2019 at Khyber medical college, pathology department, Peshawar, and comprised biopsy samples of 87 patients obtained via endoscopy which was done at the gastrointestinal endoscopy department, Hayatabad medical complex (HMC). Patients with a history of prior antibiotics and PPIs were excluded from the study. Rapid urease test (RUT) and culture of gastroduodenal biopsies were validated against the histopathological examination of gastroduodenal mucosa.
Results: Out of 87 patients, 57.47% (50/87) were male and 42.52% (37/87) were female patients with an age range of 18 -80 years and a mean age of 45 years. Endoscopic findings showed 64.36% (56/87) of patients with gastritis, duodenitis with 6.89% (6/87), peptic and duodenal ulcers with 22.98% (20/87), erosion with 4.59% (4/87) and adenocarcinoma of stomach with 2.29% (2/87). The sensitivity and specificity of culture were 45.45% and 90.7% respectively, while positive and negative predictive values were 62.5% and 83% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid urease test (RUT) were 81.81% and 90% while positive and negative predictive values were 90% and 94% respectively.
Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid urease test were 82 and 90% respectively, while that of culture was 45 and 91% respectively.
Keys Words: Helicobacter Pylori, Gastritis, Rapid urease test, Adenocarcinoma
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Medical Sciences (JMS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under the CC BY 4.0 license, author(s) retain the ownership of the copyright publishing rights without restrictions for their content, and allow others to copy, use, print, share, modify, and distribute the content of the article even for commercial purposes as long as the original authors and the journal are properly cited. No permission is required from the author/s or the publishers for this purpose. Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to JMS and its licensees in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), The corresponding author must certify and warrant the authorship and proprietorship and should declare that he/she has not granted or assigned any of the article’s rights to any other person or body.
The corresponding author must compensate the journal for any costs, expenses, or damages that the JMS may incur as a result of any breach of these warranties including any intentional or unintentional errors, omissions, copyright issues, or plagiarism. The editorial office must be notified upon submission if an article contains materials like text, pictures, tables, or graphs from other copyrighted sources. The JMS reserves the right to remove any images, figures, tables, or other content, from any article, whether before or after publication, if concerns are raised about copyright, license, or permissions and the authors are unable to provide documentation confirming that appropriate permissions were obtained for publication of the content in question.