CONJUNCTIVAL COMPLICATIONS AND INFECTION RISKS IN SMALL INCISION MANUAL CATARACT SURGERY (SIMICS) VERSUS PHACOEMULSIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.25.33.4.8Keywords:
Keywords: Cataract surgery, Conjunctival chemosis, Conjunctival hyperemia, Endophthalmitis, Infection, Phacoemulsification, Postoperative complications, SIMICS, Surgical outcomes.Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the conjunctival complications and postoperative infections between Small Incision Manual Cataract Surgery (SIMICS) and phacoemulsification.
Materials & Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, MTI-Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from June 2024 to December 2024. A total of 462 patients undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled, with 231 patients in each group (SIMICS and phacoemulsification), selected through non-probability consecutive sampling. Postoperative assessments for conjunctival chemosis, hyperemia, and infections were performed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were applied; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Conjunctival chemosis was more common in the SIMICS group (27.7%) than in the phacoemulsification group (10.0%) (p < 0.001). Conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 39.0% of SIMICS patients, compared to 17.7% in the phacoemulsification group (p < 0.001). Postoperative infection rates were also significantly higher in SIMICS (13.0%) versus phacoemulsification (6.5%) (p = 0.019). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that surgical technique independently predicted infection (p = 0.028), while age, gender, and chemosis were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: SIMICS is linked to a higher rate of conjunctival chemosis, hyperemia, and postoperative infections compared to phacoemulsification. These findings highlight the need to improve surgical techniques and postoperative care, especially in low-resource settings where SIMICS is common.
Keywords: Cataract surgery, Conjunctival chemosis, Conjunctival hyperemia, Endophthalmitis, Phacoemulsification, Small Incision Manual Cataract Surgery
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Israr, Bilal Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Medical Sciences (JMS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under the CC BY 4.0 license, author(s) retain the ownership of the copyright publishing rights without restrictions for their content, and allow others to copy, use, print, share, modify, and distribute the content of the article even for commercial purposes as long as the original authors and the journal are properly cited. No permission is required from the author/s or the publishers for this purpose. Appropriate attribution can be provided by simply citing the original article. The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to JMS and its licensees in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), The corresponding author must certify and warrant the authorship and proprietorship and should declare that he/she has not granted or assigned any of the article’s rights to any other person or body.
The corresponding author must compensate the journal for any costs, expenses, or damages that the JMS may incur as a result of any breach of these warranties including any intentional or unintentional errors, omissions, copyright issues, or plagiarism. The editorial office must be notified upon submission if an article contains materials like text, pictures, tables, or graphs from other copyrighted sources. The JMS reserves the right to remove any images, figures, tables, or other content, from any article, whether before or after publication, if concerns are raised about copyright, license, or permissions and the authors are unable to provide documentation confirming that appropriate permissions were obtained for publication of the content in question.

